SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) and REST (Representational State Transfer) have become two of the most popular architectural styles for developing web-based APIs. While both have their pros and cons, knowing the differences between them can help developers and architects determine which architecture to use when building their web-based APIs.
In this article, we will briefly explore the differences between SOAP and REST APIs, with the aim of helping readers better understand the advantages, drawbacks, and use cases of each API architecture.
REST and SOAP
REST and SOAP are not comparable. REST is a software architectural style, while SOAP is a message exchange format. Let's compare the implementations of the popular REST and SOAP styles:
- RESTful implementation example: RESTful is based on the HTTP protocol and can use JSON as the data format to transmit RESTful API.
- SOAP implementation example: SOAP is a simple protocol based on XML that allows applications to exchange information over HTTP.
At the top level, SOAP restricts the structure of messages, while REST is an architectural approach that focuses on using HTTP as the transport protocol.
- SOAP is special in that it is a data exchange format. For SOAP, it is always SOAP-XML, that is, XML, which contains the following elements:
Required SOAP envelope - the root element that defines the message and name space used in the document.
Optional SOAP header - contains message properties such as security information or network routing.
Required SOAP body - contains the message exchanged between applications.
Optional Fault element - provides information about errors that occurred while processing this message. Requests and responses must comply with the SOAP structure.
REST is special in that it uses HTTP as the transport protocol. This means taking full advantage of the features provided by HTTP - request methods, headers, responses, response headers, etc.

Message Format
- In SOAP, requests and responses must be in SOAP XML format.
- In REST, there is no fixed format. We can exchange messages based on XML, JSON, or any other format. JSON is the most popular format.
Service Definition
- SOAP uses WSDL (Web Service Description Language), which is an XML-based language used to describe and access web services.
- REST does not have a standard service definition language. Although WADL was one of the earliest proposed standards, it is not very popular. Swagger or Open API are currently more widely used and accepted.
Transport
SOAP does not impose any restrictions on the type of transport protocol used. We can use HTTP web protocol or MQ, while REST is best used with the HTTP transport protocol.
Usability RESTful web services are usually easier to implement than SOAP-based web services.
- REST usually uses JSON, which is easier to parse and process. In addition, REST does not require a service definition to provide web services.
- In addition to requiring WSDL to define services, SOAP also requires effort to process and parse SOAP-XML messages.
The Pros and Cons of SOAP vs REST API
SOAP and REST are two different styles of web services that have their own advantages and disadvantages.
SOAP API Pros: | SOAP API Cons: |
---|---|
Standardized protocol and formal contract | Higher overhead due to its XML-based message format |
Built-in error handling and security features | Slower performance compared to REST API |
Support for ACID transactions | More complex and harder to implement |
Wide support for different languages/platforms | Limited support for mobile devices and web browsers |
REST API Pros: | REST API Cons: |
---|---|
Lightweight and faster performance | Lack of standardized protocol and formal contract |
Easier to implement and maintain | No built-in error handling and security features |
Better support for mobile devices/web browsers | Limited support for ACID transactions |
Scalable and flexible architecture | Limited support for different languages/platforms |
Apidog: The Powerful API Tool
Apidog is an API development and testing tool that provides a range of functionalities for testing RESTful APIs. Like Postman, Apidog offers a user-friendly interface that allows users to create, test, and document APIs using various features such as automated testing, test suites, and API documentation.
Apidog allows users to easily create and send HTTP requests to APIs, view response data, and debug potential issues. It also provides the ability to organize requests into collections, folders, and subfolders, making it easy to manage and maintain API requests. Additionally, Apidog supports collaboration tools and various integration options with other development platforms.

In addition to testing APIs, Apidog offers capabilities such as automated testing, performance monitoring, and scripting. It also supports advanced features such as error validation, authentication, and parameterization, making it a versatile tool for developers and testers.
The Application Scenario of SOAP and REST APIs
SOAP and REST APIs are both widely used in the world of web services. However, they have different strengths and weaknesses, which make them suitable for different types of applications.
SOAP APIs are often used in enterprise-level applications that require high levels of security and reliability. They are designed to work with complex data structures and support more advanced features such as transactions and message queuing. SOAP APIs are also commonly used in applications that require a high degree of interoperability between different systems.
REST APIs, on the other hand, are more suitable for lightweight applications that require fast and efficient data transfer. They are designed to work with simple data structures and support basic features such as caching and authentication. REST APIs are also commonly used in applications that require a high degree of scalability and flexibility.
In general, SOAP APIs are better suited for applications that require a high degree of security, reliability, and interoperability, while REST APIs are better suited for applications that require fast and efficient data transfer, scalability, and flexibility. However, the choice between SOAP and REST APIs ultimately depends on the specific needs of the application and the resources available to support it.