What Is Status Code: 202 Accepted? The API's "I've Got It From Here"

What is HTTP 202 Accepted? Learn how this status code handles asynchronous processing, its use cases, and how it differs from 200 and 201. Master API workflows with tools like Apidog.

INEZA Felin-Michel

INEZA Felin-Michel

15 September 2025

What Is Status Code: 202 Accepted? The API's "I've Got It From Here"

You've just clicked a button to run a complex report. Or maybe you've requested a video transcoding job. Instead of the page freezing for minutes, you immediately get a message: "Your request has been accepted for processing." A few minutes later, you get an email with a link to your finished report.

This smooth, asynchronous experience is a hallmark of well-designed modern software. And it's powered by a crucial, yet often misunderstood, HTTP status code: 202 Accepted.

Unlike its cousin 200 OK, which says "I'm done right now," or 201 Created, which says "I made a new thing," the 202 Accepted status code is all about managing expectations. It's the server's way of saying, "Message received. I understand what you want me to do. I can't give you the result right now, but I've put it in the queue and I'll handle it. You don't need to wait around."

It's the digital equivalent of giving your ticket to a busy restaurant host. They don't bring you food immediately, but you trust that your place in line is secure and your meal will be ready eventually.

If you're building or using APIs that handle long-running tasks, understanding 202 Accepted is key to creating responsive, scalable, and user-friendly applications.

So, what does this mean, and why is it important for developers, testers, and API consumers to understand it?

And before we dive into the mechanics, if you're designing APIs that require asynchronous workflows, you need a tool that can help you test and visualize these complex interactions. Download Apidog for free; it's an all-in-one API platform that allows you to easily simulate 202 responses, test polling mechanisms, and ensure your asynchronous processes are robust and reliable.

button

Now, let's unpack what 202 Accepted means, when to use it, and how to implement it correctly.

Setting the Stage: The Problem with Synchronous Thinking

To understand why 202 is necessary, we must first recognize the limitations of synchronous requests.

The typical HTTP request-response cycle is synchronous and blocking:

  1. Client: Sends a request.
  2. Client: Waits... (this is often called "time to first byte" or TTFB).
  3. Server: Processes the request (this could involve complex calculations, database queries, calling other services).
  4. Server: Sends a response (200 OK, 201 Created, etc.).
  5. Client: Receives the response and acts on it.

This model works perfectly for quick operations fetching a user profile, retrieving a list of products, or updating a single field. But what if the operation takes 5 seconds? 30 seconds? 5 minutes?

The 202 Accepted status code is the elegant solution to this problem. It breaks the blocking nature of HTTP, allowing for asynchronous processing.

What Does HTTP 202 Accepted Actually Mean?

The HTTP 202 Accepted status code is defined in the RFC as a success response. However, it's a very specific type of success. The 202 Accepted status code belongs to the 2xx category, which generally indicates success. It indicates that:

However, unlike 200 OK, which means the request was processed successfully and is complete, 202 tells us something different:

The server has accepted the request, but the processing is not finished yet.

Crucially, the response should give the client some indication of where they can check the status of the request or where the final result will be available in the future.

In other words, 202 is the server's polite way of saying:

"Hey, I've got your request. I’m working on it. But don't expect the result right away."

This makes it especially useful for asynchronous operation processes that take time, like sending an email, processing a large dataset, or kicking off a background job.

Why Does 202 Accepted Exist?

Not all requests can be processed instantly. Imagine if every time you sent an API call, the server had to wait until the entire job was complete before responding. That could lead to:

The 202 status code solves this problem by allowing servers to acknowledge requests without making clients wait.

The Asynchronous Workflow: A Step-by-Step Breakdown

Let's walk through a concrete example. Imagine an API for generating personalized data reports.

Step 1: The Client's Request

A client application sends a POST request to start the report generation.

POST /api/reports/generate HTTP/1.1Host: api.example.comContent-Type: application/jsonAuthorization: Bearer <token>
{
  "type": "annual_sales",
  "year": 2023,
  "format": "pdf"
}

Step 2: The Server's 202 Response

The server receives the request. It validates that the request is well-formed and the user is authorized. It then immediately places the job into a processing queue (using a system like Redis, RabbitMQ, or Amazon SQS) and responds.

HTTP/1.1 202 AcceptedLocation: <https://api.example.com/api/reports/status/job-12345Content-Type:> application/json
{
  "message": "Your report generation request has been accepted and is being processed.",
  "job_id": "job-12345",
  "status_url": "<https://api.example.com/api/reports/status/job-12345>",
  "estimated_completion_time": "2023-10-27T10:05:00Z"
}

This response is incredibly powerful. Let's break it down:

Step 3: The Asynchronous Processing

The client is now free to do other things. Meanwhile, on the server:

Step 4: The Client Checks for Completion

The client can now poll the status_url provided in the 202 response.

GET https://api.example.com/api/reports/status/job-12345

The response to this polling request might change over time:

Alternatively, the server could send a notification via a webhook to a URL provided by the client, which is a more advanced and efficient pattern than polling.

Key Characteristics of 202 Accepted

Here are the essential traits of a 202 response:

202 Accepted vs. Other Success Codes: Knowing the Difference

It's easy to confuse 202 with other 2xx codes. Here’s a simple cheat sheet:

Use 202 when the outcome will be available in the future, not immediately.

Why Use 202 Accepted? The Key Benefits

  1. Improved User Experience (UX): The client application remains responsive. Users get immediate feedback that their request was received, not a spinning wheel of death.
  2. Better Server Scalability: The server's main request-handling threads are freed up almost instantly. They delegate the heavy lifting to background workers, allowing the server to handle many more incoming requests.
  3. Handles Uncertainty: The server can accept a request even if it's not 100% sure it can be fulfilled later. For example, it might accept a request that depends on a third-party service that is temporarily down.
  4. Realistic for Complex Operations: It accurately models real-world processes that take time, like sending emails, processing videos, running machine learning models, or handling large data exports.

Real-World Use Cases for HTTP 202

You'll encounter 202 Accepted in many modern applications:

Benefits of Using 202 Accepted

Why should developers and API designers use 202?

  1. Prevents client timeouts: Users don't have to wait.
  2. Improves scalability: Servers don't get locked up on long tasks.
  3. Better user feedback: Instead of silence, clients know the request is being handled.
  4. Supports async architectures: Essential for modern microservices.

202 Accepted in Asynchronous Workflows

Here's how it typically works:

  1. Client sends a request.
  2. Server responds with 202 and possibly a "status URL."
  3. Client checks back with the status endpoint to see if the job is done.

For example:

{
  "status": "processing",
  "check_status": "/jobs/12345/status"
}

This pattern keeps both sides happy: the client gets instant acknowledgment, and the server gets breathing room.

Testing 202 Workflows with Apidog

Testing an asynchronous API flow is more complex than testing a simple synchronous call. This is where Apidog becomes an invaluable tool.

With Apidog, you can:

  1. Script the Flow: Create a test scenario that first sends the POST request and validates that it returns a 202 with a status_url.
  2. Extract Variables: Use Apidog's scripting to automatically extract the job_id or status_url from the 202 response and save it as an environment variable.
  3. Test Polling: Create a subsequent GET request that uses the extracted variable to call the status_url. You can configure Apidog to retry this request until it gets a "completed" status.
  4. Validate the Final Result: Once the job is done, write assertions to validate the final response from the download URL.

This allows you to automate the testing of the entire asynchronous journey, ensuring reliability and catching regressions.

How to Test 202 Accepted Responses (with Apidog)

This is where Apidog shines. Unlike static tools, Apidog lets you:

With Apidog, you can build and test end-to-end 202 workflows from acceptance to completion without switching tools.

button

Potential Pitfalls and Common Misunderstandings

That said, 202 can be misused. Some pitfalls include:

Challenges and Best Practices

Implementing 202 correctly requires careful thought.

  1. Provide a Status Endpoint: This is non-negotiable. You must provide a URL (via the Location header or the response body) where the client can check the progress and final outcome of the request.
  2. Idempotency is Crucial: If a client isn't sure their request went through (e.g., due to a network issue), they might retry. Your API should be designed to handle duplicate requests gracefully using idempotency keys to prevent the same job from being queued multiple times.
  3. Set Clear Expectations: Use the response body to give an estimated time to completion or a simple status message (queued, processing, failed, succeeded).
  4. Consider Webhooks: For a more efficient alternative to polling, allow clients to register a webhook URL that your server will call when the job is complete.
  5. Plan for Failure: The job might fail in the background. Your status endpoint needs to communicate failures and potentially provide reason codes.

Best Practices for Implementing 202 Accepted

If you're designing APIs that return 202, keep these best practices in mind:

202 Accepted in REST vs GraphQL APIs

Conclusion: Embracing Asynchronous Design

The HTTP 202 Accepted Status code is a powerful tool in the API designer's toolkit. It represents a shift from thinking about APIs as simple request-response mechanisms to thinking of them as systems for orchestrating complex, real-world workflows. The 202 Accepted status code might not be the most famous HTTP code, but it plays a critical role in asynchronous API workflows. It tells clients, "We've got your request, but we're still working on it."

By using 202, you build APIs that are more scalable, more resilient, and that provide a far superior experience for the developers who use them and the end-users who ultimately benefit from them.

It acknowledges that not everything in software happens instantly, and it provides a standardized, robust way to handle that reality.

So the next time you're designing an endpoint for a long-running task, don't force it to be synchronous. Embrace the asynchronous nature of the task. Return a202 Accepted, provide a status URL, and free your application from the tyranny of the waiting request. If you're building or testing APIs that return 202, you need tools that let you simulate, test, and document these workflows without hassle. That's exactly what Apidog delivers. Use a tool like Apidog to ensure your implementation is robust, testable, and a pleasure to integrate with. Ready to simplify your API testing and documentation? Download Apidog for free today and make handling codes like 202 Accepted effortless.

button

Explore more

What Is Status Code: 203 Non-Authoritative Information? The Middleman's Memo

What Is Status Code: 203 Non-Authoritative Information? The Middleman's Memo

What is HTTP 203 Non-Authoritative Information? This guide explains this rare status code, its use with proxies, caching, and transformation, and how it differs from 200 OK.

15 September 2025

Apidog vs GitBook: Which Tool Is Best for API Documentation in 2025?

Apidog vs GitBook: Which Tool Is Best for API Documentation in 2025?

Choosing between Apidog and GitBook for API documentation? Discover how Apidog outperforms GitBook with live testing, auto sync, mock servers, and zero-code setup, all for free. Stop wasting time on static docs.

15 September 2025

Is Claude Code Getting Dumber? The Real Truth About Switching to CodeX CLI

Is Claude Code Getting Dumber? The Real Truth About Switching to CodeX CLI

Discover if Claude Code's performance is declining and whether CodeX CLI offers better coding assistance. Compare features, benchmarks, and real-world performance to make the right choice for your development workflow in 2025.

15 September 2025

Practice API Design-first in Apidog

Discover an easier way to build and use APIs