Long Polling vs WebSocket: Key Differences You Should Know

Habibur Rahman

Habibur Rahman

16 May 2025

Long Polling vs WebSocket: Key Differences You Should Know

In the realm of web development, the choice between Long Polling and WebSocket can significantly impact the functionality and user experience of an application. These two methods, while serving a similar purpose of enabling client-server communication, differ markedly in their approach and efficiency. Let's explore these differences in more detail, along with a comprehensive comparison table to clarify their distinct features.

💡
Choose Apidog for WebSocket API Testing – it's your gateway to unparalleled precision and reliability. Unleash the full potential of your APIs with our cutting-edge tools and experience seamless testing like never before.
Click the "Download" button now and take your API performance to the next level!
button

In-Depth Analysis

Long Polling:

Long Polling is an enhanced version of the classic polling technique. It involves the client sending a request to the server, which holds the request open until new data is available. This reduces unnecessary data transfers and server load compared to traditional polling, where the client repeatedly requests information at regular intervals, regardless of whether new data is available.

Long Polling
Long Polling

Example: Implementing Long Polling in JavaScript

function poll() {
    const xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
    xhr.onreadystatechange = function() {
        if (xhr.readyState === XMLHttpRequest.DONE) {
            if (xhr.status === 200) {
                // Process the server's response here
                console.log("Data received:", xhr.responseText);
            }
            // Issue a new polling request
            poll();
        }
    };
    xhr.open("GET", "https://example.com/data", true);
    xhr.send();
}

// Initial call to start the polling process
poll();

In this example, a JavaScript function poll() is defined as sending a GET request to the server. The server holds this request open until new data is ready. When data is received, the client logs the response and immediately initiates another request, creating a continuous polling cycle.

WebSocket:

WebSocket, in contrast, establishes a persistent, full-duplex communication channel over a single connection. This means that data can be sent from client to server and vice versa independently and simultaneously, without the need for multiple requests or waiting for a response. WebSocket provides a more efficient way of transferring data in real-time, ideal for applications that require immediate updates, such as live streaming or online gaming.

WebSocket
WebSocket

Example: Setting Up a WebSocket Connection in JavaScript

const socket = new WebSocket('wss://example.com/socket');

// Connection opened
socket.addEventListener('open', function (event) {
    socket.send('Hello Server!');
});

// Listen for messages
socket.addEventListener('message', function (event) {
    console.log('Message from server:', event.data);
});

Here, a WebSocket connection is created to a server. The client listens for the 'open' event to send a message to the server and sets up a listener for incoming messages from the server.

Key Differences: Long Polling vs WebSocket

Communication Model:

Connection Overhead:

Real-Time Capability:

Resource Utilization:

Complexity and Support:

Use Cases:

Comprehensive Comparison Table:

Long Polling vs WebSocket

Feature Long Polling WebSocket
Communication Sequential request-response Bidirectional, simultaneous communication
Connection Multiple, transient connections Single, persistent connection
Data Transfer Delayed, server waits to respond Instant, real-time data transfer
Resource Use Higher, due to frequent connections Lower, single-connection
Complexity Easier to implement, more requests More complex, efficient data exchange
Browser Support Broader, including older browsers Limited, mainly modern browsers
Use Cases Non-real-time applications Real-time applications
Scalability Less scalable, frequent connections More scalable, fewer connections
Latency Higher, request-response nature Lower, continuous connection

Why Choose Apidog for WebSocket API Testing?

button

In the fast-paced world of web development, WebSocket APIs are revolutionizing real-time communication. However, testing these APIs can be a complex task. Apidog emerges as a powerful solution, streamlining this process with its suite of specialized features. Let's dive into the reasons why Apidog stands out as the go-to tool for WebSocket API testing.

WebSocket API Testing With Apidog
WebSocket API Testing With Apidog

Key Advantages of Using Apidog

  1. User-Friendly Interface: Apidog demystifies WebSocket testing with an intuitive, easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for both novices and experienced developers.
  2. Real-Time Interaction Simulation: Critical for WebSocket APIs, Apidog effectively simulates two-way communication, mirroring real-world scenarios to test the API's dynamic behavior.
  3. Comprehensive Debugging Tools: The platform offers robust debugging capabilities, essential for identifying and resolving complex issues within WebSocket communication.
  4. Performance Testing Capabilities: Apidog allows you to evaluate the performance of your WebSocket API under various stress conditions, ensuring reliability and responsiveness.
  5. Collaboration Features: Facilitating teamwork, Apidog supports collaborative testing environments, enabling teams to share tests and insights efficiently.
  6. Seamless Integration: It integrates smoothly with other development tools, enhancing the workflow and ensuring a more streamlined testing process.

Conclusion

The decision to use Long Polling or WebSocket depends on the specific needs and constraints of your project. Consider factors like the nature of the data exchange, real-time requirements, resource limitations, and browser compatibility when making your choice. By aligning these key differences with your application's needs, you can ensure a more efficient, responsive, and user-friendly experience.

Explore more

Make NotebookLM Work for You: 3 Real-World Scenarios

Make NotebookLM Work for You: 3 Real-World Scenarios

Drowning in scattered docs and endless Slack threads? Google’s NotebookLM acts as your team’s AI research assistant—centralizing knowledge, automating meeting summaries, and onboarding new hires faster. Discover how this powerful tool is redefining modern productivity.

24 June 2025

A Prompt for Smoother Claude Code Onboarding

A Prompt for Smoother Claude Code Onboarding

Onboarding new AI tools often stalls on unclear rules, scattered files, and lengthy reviews. Discover a concise Claude Code prompt and step-by-step workflow that auto-generates, updates, and proposes missing docs.

23 June 2025

How to Use Circle API to Trade USDC

How to Use Circle API to Trade USDC

USD Coin (USDC) has emerged as a cornerstone of stability and reliability. As a fully reserved, dollar-backed stablecoin, USDC bridges the gap between traditional fiat currency and the burgeoning world of digital assets. It offers the speed and global reach of cryptocurrencies while maintaining the price stability of the U.S. dollar, making it an ideal medium for commerce, trading, and remittances on the internet. At the heart of the USDC ecosystem is Circle, the principal developer of the stab

23 June 2025

Practice API Design-first in Apidog

Discover an easier way to build and use APIs