Google Antigravity vs Cursor 2.0: The Ultimate AI Coding IDE Showdown

Google Antigravity vs Cursor 2.0: Which AI Coding IDE Wins for Developers?

As AI-powered code editors rapidly evolve, two platforms stand out for engineering teams: Google Antigravity and Cursor 2.0. Google’s Antigravity introduces a multi-agent IDE built on Gemini 3, prioritizing intelligent agent orchestration and artifact tracking. In contrast, Cursor 2.0 transforms the familiar VS Code experience with parallel AI agents, its own fast Composer model, and robust developer workflow tools.

Which platform best fits high-performance API development, backend engineering, and collaborative coding? Let’s break down their features, strengths, weaknesses, and what they really offer for teams optimizing productivity and workflow.

💡 Looking for an all-in-one API testing platform that boosts your team's efficiency and generates beautiful API documentation? Discover how Apidog streamlines collaboration and replaces Postman at a better price for agile development.

What Is Google Antigravity? Gemini-Powered Agent IDE Explained

Google Antigravity is a next-generation, agent-first coding environment powered by Gemini 3 Pro. Designed to centralize and orchestrate multiple AI agents, it enables advanced automation across your editor, terminal, and even browser—all from a unified interface.

Key Features:

• Agent Manager: Launch, coordinate, and monitor multiple agents using a dedicated manager window. This keeps your main coding area uncluttered.

  

• Artifacts: Every agent action logs artifacts—task plans, screenshots, and browser recordings—giving full visibility and traceability for later review.

• Generous Free Tier: Public preview access supports Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering substantial Gemini 3 Pro usage at no cost.

• Chrome Integration: Install a browser extension to let agents interact directly with Chrome, enabling browser action recording and automated UI flows.

  

• Flexible Modes:

  • Planning Mode: Structure and plan out complex development tasks.
  • Fast Mode: Speed through iterative coding cycles.

  

• Workspaces & Inbox: Manage multiple projects simultaneously and track all agent messages, updates, and feedback in a centralized inbox.

  

Antigravity Limitations & Early User Feedback

• Users report occasional agent crashes and unstable browser integration.

  

• The free tier, while generous, may limit heavy users relying on Gemini 3.

  

• Some workarounds require conversation restarts or manual resets due to first-release instability.

Developer Takeaways

• The Agent Manager and artifact recording are standout innovations—ideal for debugging and compliance.
• While still rough around the edges, Antigravity’s architecture hints at major future potential for larger engineering teams.

What Is Cursor 2.0? Parallel AI Agents in a Familiar IDE

Cursor 2.0 pushes the boundaries of AI coding by embedding a multi-agent system and its proprietary Composer model inside a VS Code–like editor. The result: rapid, parallelized coding and testing, tailored for dev teams who value speed and iterative workflows.

Notable Features:

• Composer Model: Purpose-built for code, Composer completes tasks in ~30 seconds, supporting fast prototyping.

  

• Up to 8 Parallel Agents: Leverage multiple agents in isolated workspaces (with git worktrees or remote environments) for true parallel development.

  

• Embedded Browser Tool: Test and automate front-end flows with an in-editor browser, allowing DOM inspection and UI validation.

  

• Sandboxed Terminals: On macOS, run shell commands in a secure, isolated environment (default: workspace access only, no internet).

• Voice Mode: Use speech-to-text to trigger agent actions or define custom keywords for smoother hands-free coding.

  

• Team Commands: Share custom rules and workflows across your team via the dashboard for consistent automation.

  0

• Contextual Performance: Composer excels at semantic search and understanding large codebases, making it ideal for complex systems.

Cursor 2.0: Trade-offs & Challenges

• Some users find managing multiple agents and git worktrees confusing at first.
• Merging outputs from parallel agents requires careful review.
• Composer’s speed may occasionally prioritize velocity over absolute correctness (as reported by AI Tool Analysis).

Developer Impressions

• Cursor 2.0 feels like having a mini AI dev team inside your IDE—excellent for rapid prototyping and multi-agent collaboration.
• Embedded browser and sandboxed terminals enable end-to-end code generation, testing, and validation—all within one tool.

Feature Comparison: Google Antigravity vs Cursor 2.0

Which AI Coding IDE Should You Choose?

• Choose Google Antigravity if:

  • You want a centralized agent management system and deep artifact tracking.
  • You're invested in Gemini 3 workflows and need browser automation via Chrome.
  • You value traceability for debugging or compliance.

• Choose Cursor 2.0 if:

  • You need high-speed code iteration, parallel agent execution, and a familiar VS Code-like interface.
  • Your team benefits from rapid prototyping and multi-agent collaboration.
  • You prefer built-in browser interaction and sandboxed terminal automation.

Expert Opinion:
Cursor 2.0 offers a stable, mature multi-agent environment ideal for production and team workflows. Google Antigravity, while promising, is best suited for early adopters eager to explore advanced agent orchestration and artifact-driven development. Both tools can complement each other in modern engineering stacks.

For API-focused development and integrated team workflows, consider pairing your chosen IDE with Apidog's collaborative API platform, which boosts productivity and centralizes all your API design, testing, and documentation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. Is Google Antigravity free?
Yes—public preview with generous Gemini 3 Pro limits.

Q2. How many agents can I run in Cursor 2.0?
Up to 8 parallel agents, each in its own isolated workspace.

Q3. Can agents in both tools interact with a browser?

• Antigravity: Yes, via Chrome extension for recording and automation.
• Cursor 2.0: Yes, with an embedded browser supporting DOM inspection.

Q4. What if an Antigravity agent makes a mistake?
Artifacts (plans, screenshots, logs) are generated so you can review, correct, or reassign tasks.

Q5. Should I switch tools now, or wait?
If you need stability and fast iteration, Cursor 2.0 is reliable today. To explore cutting-edge agent orchestration, try Antigravity during its preview phase.

Conclusion: The Future of AI-Powered Coding

Both Google Antigravity and Cursor 2.0 offer unique visions for the future of AI-assisted development. Antigravity excels in agent orchestration and artifact transparency, while Cursor 2.0 delivers speed and parallelism in a proven coding environment.

For API-centric teams, combining these tools with a platform like Apidog ensures seamless API design, testing, and documentation—critical for maintaining quality and velocity in modern software projects.

💡 Want to unify your developer workflows and maximize productivity? Try Apidog’s all-in-one API platform—it’s designed for teams and more affordable than Postman.