Why It’s OK to Be Amoral argues that self-righteous moralism has replaced religion as a source of embattled and gratuitous certainties. High-minded moral convictions invoke the authority of sacred moral truths, but there are no such truths. In reality, moral passions are rooted in atavistic emotional dispositions and arbitrary social conventions. While public and private discourse is saturated with guilt, shame and righteous indignation, professional philosophers, under cover of clever argumentation, promote the utopian idea that all practical questions have uniquely right answers—providing that you adopt the right moral principles. But their justifications for those principles appeal to contested ‘foundations’, among which no rational adjudication is possible. Moreover, because there are two discrepant ways of understanding motivation, our access to agents’ true reasons is never sufficiently reliable to warrant moral praise or blame. Finally, every agent has a wide diversity of reasons for action, yet moralists claim that some reasons trump all others, because they are ‘moral’ reasons. Since these too must be grounded in facts, that amounts to double counting some reasons. Having exposed these aspects of the institution of morality, this book suggests that if we cannot abstain altogether from moralising, we can at least try to use it against itself. Key Features Describes and criticises seven approaches to the question, Why should I do or not do X? Develops an original objection to the idea of identifying a domain of moral reasons: namely, that it amounts to the unwarranted double counting of a subset of our reasons. Describes two ways of thinking about reasons and choices, and explains how the discrepancy between them makes it impossible to assess an agent’s motivation reliably enough to warrant moral praise or blame. Outlines the subtle changes in attitude involved in espousing amoralism, without giving up on rational choices and honest political commitments.Why It's Ok to Be Amoral: Technologies of the Self, "Why it's OK to Be Amoral argues that self-righteous moralism has replaced religion as a source of embattled and gratuitous certainties. An Amoral Manifesto (Part II) | Issue 81 good in the long run. Furthermore, my own way of speaking about amoral Well, if we really were egoists, then it would be impossible for us to be moral. Are Humans Amoral? - by Michael Huemer - Fake Noûs Sharks are neither good nor evil. If a shark bites you, it's not being evil. It's just amoral, because it cannot understand moral concepts, Money is Amoral And I think it's a good point to make. The money itself isn't Money is amoral but not used correctly can lead to immoral. Reply. Are Economists Basically Immoral? Lessons from Paul Immoral?”1. Spoiler alert, the answer is “no”. However, it is easy to see how economists get a bad rap when the public thinks economics is Double counting | Why It's OK to Be Amoral | Ronald de Sousa Double counting. DOI link for Double counting. Double counting. ByRonald de Sousa · ORCID Icon. BookWhy It's OK to Be Amoral. Click here to navigate to parent A Moral vs. Amoral vs. Immoral (Grammar Rules) Correct: An immoral person knows lying is bad. Correct: Math is an amoral subject. Incorrect: Math is a moral subject. Incorrect: Math is an Ethics of Pacifism: When is the Amoral Choice Not Using In order to minimize harm and maximize good in the world, we're going to have to have a real conversation about when do you use force; when is the amoral Being Amoral - Psychopathy and Moral Incapacity Being Amoral provides a good overview of the current state of debate it a valuable contribution to the literature, which I recommend to anyone Why It's OK to Be Amoral: 9781032235554 Why It's OK to Be Amoral argues that self-righteous moralism has replaced religion as a source of embattled and gratuitous certainties. Why It's OK to Be Amoral: 9781032232836 Why it's OK to Be Amoral argues that self-righteous moralism has replaced religion as a source of embattled and gratuitous certainties. 11/01/23 – Immoral or Amoral | Spacetrawler The crimes of the immoral can be grievous and horrifying. But they are predictable. And punishable. The crimes of the amoral don't even qualify